top of page

Claim of

A claim of right is a genuine belief held by a person that they have a bona fide claim of right to certain money or property is a defence to any crime of which larceny is an element. The defence extends to any person who takes the property on behalf of another, or in collaboration with another, if they believe other person has a bona fide claim of right to the money or property in question.

An Accused person must call evidence to raise the defence of claim of right. However, once the Accused person discharges the evidentiary onus, the prosecution must then negate the defence of claim of right beyond a reasonable doubt.

Claim of right is a defence available to offences which contain the elements of larceny – including larceny itself, larceny as a clerk or servant, break and enter, robbery and other property offences.

It is essentially where you took property because you genuinely believed you were legally entitled to it.

The authorities relating to claim of right were reviewed in the case of R v Fuge (2001) 123 A Crim R 310 at 314–315, which outlined the following principles:

  1. The claim of right must involve a belief as to the right to the property or money in the hands of another.

  2. The claim must be genuinely held — whether it was well founded in fact or law or not.

  3. While the belief does not have to be reasonable, a colourable pretence is insufficient.

  4. The belief must be one of a legal entitlement to the property and not simply a moral entitlement.

  5. The existence of such a claim, when genuinely held, may constitute an answer to a crime in which the means used to take the property involved an assault, or the use of arms — the relevant issue being whether the accused had a genuine belief in a legal right to the property rather than a belief in a legal right to employ the means in question to recover it.

  6. The claim of right is not confined to the specific property or banknotes which were once held by the claimant, but can also extend to cases where what is taken is their equivalent in value, although that may be qualified when, for example, the property is taken ostensibly under a claim of right to hold them by way of safekeeping, or as security for a loan, yet the actual intention was to sell them.

  7. The claim of right must, however, extend to the entirety of the property or money taken. Such a claim does not provide any answer where the property or money taken intentionally goes beyond that to which the bona fide claim attaches.

  8. In the case of an offender charged as an accessory, what is relevant is the existence of a bona fide claim in the principal offender or offenders. There can be no accessorial liability unless there has in fact been a foundational knowing of the essential facts which made what was done a crime, and unless the person who is charged as an accessory intentionally aided, abetted, counselled or procured those acts.

  9. It is for the Crown to negative a claim of right where it is sufficiently raised on the evidence, to the satisfaction of the jury.

Make a booking to arrange a free consult today!

Thanks for submitting!



Invictus Legal | Sydney Criminal & Traffic Defence Lawyers



Level 35, Tower One, International Towers,

100 Barangaroo Avenue,

Sydney, 2000, NSW, Australia


Tel: 02 8046 7634

Click Here to Find Us

If you have any questions or would like to schedule a consultation, please fill out the form below and we will get back to you as soon as possible.

Thank You

bottom of page